![]() ![]() ![]() Reliability & Validity Criteria Some argue that qualitative researchers should consider validity and reliability from the philosophical assumptions underlying the chosen paradigm. If somebody else did the study, would they get the same results? Doesn’t the researcher’s presence result in a change in participants’ normal behavior, thus contaminating the data? 10. Without hypotheses, how will you know what you’re looking for? 8. Isn’t the researcher biased and just finding out what he or she expects to find? 7. How will you know when to stop collecting data? If the researcher is the primary instrument for data collection and analysis, how can we be sure the researcher is a valid and reliable instrument? 5. How can you generalize from a small, nonrandom sample? ![]() ![]() What is it worth to just get the researcher’s interpretation of what is taking place? 3. Reliability & Validity Challenges What can you possibly tell from an n of 1? 2. By contrast the qualitative study describes people acting in events.” (Firestone, 1987, p. The quantitative study portrays a world of variables and static states. The qualitative study provides the reader with a depiction in enough detail to show that the author’s conclusion ‘makes sense’. Quant “The quantitative study must convince the reader that procedures have been followed faithfully because very little concrete description of what anyone does is provided. Reliability & Validity Qualitative Research Methods ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |